Sunday, 21 April 2013

Mumbai terror attacks 2008


Mumbai terror attacks: the making of a monster


 


The testimony of the only gunman captured alive after the Mumbai massacre in 2008 provided a unique insight into the mind of a terrorist. So what turned a boy from a farming village into a cold-blooded killer?


Barney Henderson


9:00PM BST 12 Apr 2013         The London Telegraph

 

On the evening of November 26 2008 I was having a drink in one of Mumbai’s plethora of upmarket bars when I got a call from a journalist friend telling me there had been a bomb at Chhatrapati Shivaji railway station.

 

I sprinted out of the bar, caught a cab downtown and was one of the first reporters on the scene. It soon became clear the city was under attack. The Taj Mahal Palace and Trident-Oberoi hotels and a Jewish centre had been occupied by gunmen. A backpacker bar – which would have been the venue for our drinks had one of the group not been delayed – had been sprayed with bullets.

 

I spent that night and much of the following three days camped out at the various target sites as not only reporters but also police, the military and politicians tried to grasp what was happening. It was one of the most intricately planned terrorist attacks of recent years, which took New Delhi to the brink of war with Pakistan, and has become known as India’s 9/11. The attack had a significant impact on counter-terrorism strategies around the world, with security services put on high alert to the risk of 'Mumbai-style’ incursions on soft targets.

 

After a 59-hour siege ended with the shooting dead of the last terrorists holed up in Nariman House Jewish centre, the country was united in shock and grief. Ten young men had sailed from Pakistan armed with AK-47 assault rifles and carrying backpacks full of ammunition and attacked the city’s landmark sites with apparent ease, eventually killing 166 people, including 22 foreigners. The figurehead for the country’s collective hatred over 26/11, as it came to be called, was Ajmal Amir Kasab, the lone surviving gunman.

 

Kasab was 21 when he strolled into the railway station carrying an AK-47 and indiscriminately shot at men, women and children. Grenades blew up those queuing for tickets in the snaking lines. Fifty-two people were killed and dozens more were injured as the vast ticket hall of the city’s busiest and most historic station – formerly called Victoria Terminus and inspired by St Pancras in London – was ruthlessly turned into a slaughterhouse.

 

Kasab, nicknamed the Butcher of Bombay (kasab means butcher in Urdu), was hanged last November, almost four years after the attack. His execution was welcomed by relations of the victims, the Indian authorities and the wider population as a chance to draw a line under the terror. Yet when I returned to Mumbai last year to conduct research for an MA in terrorism at King’s College London, it was clear that many questions remained about the life of Kasab.

 

What had propelled him from a farming village in rural Pakistan via military-style boot camps run by the Islamic terrorist organisation Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and on to murder in Mumbai?

 

Kasab grew up in Faridkot, a small village in Pakistan’s Punjab. Consisting of a central dusty square bordered by tea stalls and food huts, the village is surrounded by cultivated rice fields. Kasab’s father, Amir Shahban, came from a family of butchers, but after becoming estranged from his parents he ended up in Faridkot hawking fried snacks in the square.

 

The Kasabs were not cripplingly poor, but when Shahban’s health began to deteriorate after he contracted tuberculosis, he took Ajmal Amir, then 11, out of school and sent him to work the family’s handcart.

 

Friends from Faridkot recalled a cheeky but not malevolent young boy who enjoyed karate and watching Bollywood films. 'He was very active, always jumping around. He loved watching films,’ Haji Mohammad Aslam, a neighbour, said. 'He would stay out until midnight watching TV in shops and street restaurants. But there was not evil in him, we can’t believe he would do this.’

 

Kasab didn’t want to become his father – he wanted to be something special. As he got older he became bored with his life selling fried snacks and sitting around the square’s tea stalls with the other village men at dusk while the women prepared dinner.

 

He began to fight regularly with his parents, usually over money. In 2005 Shahban decided to let his son move to Lahore to look for work, in the hope that he would send cash back to the family. His mother, Noor, said she would arrange a marriage for him, although Kasab was not keen to settle down.

 

Bewitched by the metropolis, he fell in with a group of street youths. Along with his new best friend, Muzaffar Lal, Kasab wandered from one temporary job to the next – washing plates in a restaurant, running errands for a guest house – but as the months drifted by, he realised his future was looking bleak. 'I was working hard, I was just not being paid well for my work,’ Kasab said in his written plea presented at his trial in July 2009, a copy of which was given to me while in Mumbai. Kasab and Muzaffar turned to petty crime, then burglary. But their hopes that crime would lift them to a better life were dashed after two unsuccessful break-ins and a failed attempt to buy a £30 colonial-era pistol.




They moved on to the city of Rawalpindi and, before long, were back working in the sweltering kitchen of a grimy backstreet restaurant, bereft of money, ideas and hope. Then, in December 2007, a chance encounter with a bearded Muslim preacher late one night at a market stall was to set Kasab and Muzaffar on to the path of jihad.

 

The man who recruited them was apparently called Shabaan Mustaq, a volunteer in the education arm of Jamaat-ud-Dawa (JuD), the political face of LeT, whose aim is to 'liberate’ Kashmir from India. Kasab spoke of his struggles to find work and his family’s need for money. Mustaq invited them to join the Jamaat, promising it would transform their lives. As they parted Kasab asked, 'And will they show us how to use guns?’ The man smiled and nodded.

 

Dr Christine Fair, a terrorism expert from Georgetown University in Washington, DC, who has studied the recruitment of young men into terrorist organisations, describes the appeal of LeT to young Pakistani potential recruits as its having the 'Rambo factor – even more of the “wow” factor than al-Qaeda’.

 

Mujahideen fighters for Lashkar-e-Taiba, which means Army of the Pure, are lionised by Islamic extremists across Pakistan. It is one of the most feared groups fighting for control of Kashmir, and has launched multiple strikes against India, including the 2001 attack on the Indian parliament in New Delhi.

 

Since the beginning of the conflict with India over control of Kashmir after the hasty break-up of the Raj in the aftermath of the Second World War, Pakistan has relied on militant organisations to carry out attacks across the border.

 

LeT was founded in 1986 – with state support – to kill Indians in Kashmir. But after Pakistan joined America in its 'War on Terror’ following the 9/11 attacks, LeT was added to a list of banned organisations by President Pervez Musharraf in 2002 under pressure from Washington. LeT acted quickly to establish JuD as a front organisation to serve as its public face, and it continued to operate much as it had before the ban, with offices in most Pakistani cities and support from members of the army.

 

The chance to become a fearless soldier fighting for his country certainly appealed to Kasab, and so began his journey into the world of Islamic extremism and training to become a Mujahideen, prepared to lay down his life for Allah.

 

Three days after their meeting with Mustaq, Kasab and Muzaffar reported to the JuD offices in Rawalpindi, and within days were enrolled in their first three-week course in Muridke, in the north east of Pakistan. Kasab spent the next 10 months in intensive preparation for the Mumbai attacks, which had already been carefully planned by LeT’s leaders.

 

He travelled the country, spending weeks at a time at various JuD and LeT bases – some public and some very secret – returning to his home village only once during that time. The training began with Islamic teachings and a build-up of anti-India propaganda, instilling the belief in the recruits that their neighbours were hated infidels.

 

Kasab and Muzaffar were moved around together to different camps, but never with the same group of recruits. They experienced a standard of food, lodgings and respect they could previously only have dreamt of. 'We were given the best food and the best clothes,’ Kasab recalled in his first interrogation by Mumbai police after his arrest. 'Chacha ['Uncle’ – Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi, a founding member of LeT and the chief planner of the Mumbai attacks] said we could have anything in the world we wanted before setting out for Mumbai.’

 

Religious indoctrination was constant. Prayer sessions started at 4am and continued throughout the day, interspersed with physical training, religious and political lectures, food and rest. One night, according to his testimony, Kasab and Muzaffar were told to get into a truck, which travelled in a convoy of vehicles to rural Kahori in the south east of the country.

 

They were introduced to the camp’s commander, named only as Major General Sahib [Sir], who was reportedly still a commissioned officer in the Pakistan army, to begin 21 days of advanced physical and combat training.

 

In February 2008 Kasab returned to Faridkot, but it was a short and unhappy homecoming. His mother implored him to stay and marry a girl from the village. According to a family friend, Kasab showed a few of the village boys his newfound wrestling skills and then asked his mother to bless him, saying he was going for jihad. Kasab’s parents, when interviewed the week after the attack by Pakistan’s Dawn newspaper, denied that they knew he had joined a Mujahideen organisation. Kasab had originally told the police in Mumbai that his father had made him join LeT.

 

After a few hours at home, Kasab boarded a bus that would take him to his next camp and the start of his final preparation for jihad. Kasab had been singled out by LeT – he was completely committed to the cause, physically very fit and trained in commando techniques. It was not long before he was presented to Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi.

 

 

Kasab had not held strong Islamic beliefs before he was recruited – a Mumbai policeman told me that in the months after his arrest he could not recite a single passage from the Koran. His understanding of jihad was flawed and simplistic. 'It [jihad] is about killing and getting killed and becoming famous,’ Kasab said at his first interrogation.

 

His handlers had filled him with hate by the promise of living out his military fantasies, being seen as a real man in the eyes of his fellow villagers, and providing 'riches’ for his family. 'Chacha told me it’s a very honourable and daring job,’ Kasab said. 'You earn respect, it’s the work of God.

 

We were told that our big brother India is so rich and we are dying of poverty and hunger. My father sells dahi wada in a stall and we did not even get enough food to eat from his earnings. I was promised that once they knew that I was successful in my operation, they would give 150,000 rupees [£1,000] to my family… Come, kill and die after a killing spree. By this, one will become famous and will also make Allah proud.’

 

Hundreds of young men and women are recruited to jihad organisations every year, in Pakistan and the world’s other terrorism hotspots such as Afghanistan, Yemen, Syria, Indonesia – not to mention in Western Europe and the US. In Pakistan many are radicalised at unregulated madrassas – Islamic schools described by the American writer Jeffrey Goldberg as 'jihad factories’.


The July 7 2005 London bombers allegedly spent time in a Pakistani madrassa. Recent reports, including one by Stanford and New York universities’ law schools last year, have suggested that the US drone programme, which has killed hundreds of civilians in the Afghanistan-Pakistan border regions, has facilitated recruitment to extremist groups and motivated violent attacks.

 

Seventy-four per cent of Pakistanis now consider the US to be the enemy, the report found. Groups such as LeT also gain footholds in communities by investing in charity projects; after the 2005 Kashmir earthquake, JuD relief workers reacted more quickly and successfully than the government.

 

The assertion that poverty causes terrorism has been widely held by Western governments, particularly the Bush administration, which invested billions of dollars in development programmes in Pakistan in the hope of stopping the recruitment of terrorists. But as the case of Kasab highlights, there is never a single reason why teenagers and young men become radicalised.

 

 

LeT has shown a willingness to recruit both well-educated graduates for high-level operations (working undercover in India, for example), and low-level suicide attackers. Last year the group recruited two teenage boys, aged 12 and 13, to throw grenades at a police post in Sopore, in India’s Jammu and Kashmir state, in return for 1,000 rupees (£6.50).

 

'Lashkar recruited for the Mumbai mission as rational users of labour, in exactly the same way as McDonald’s,’ Dr Fair says. 'There is a market for terrorists, of both high quality and low quality. In Kasab’s case he was certainly an aberration from the other Lashkar recruits we have studied in the sense that he was only educated to 4th standard [age 10], whereas the average had 10th standard [age 16] education and above.

 

It was clear that he had a low aptitude and was recruited to be sent to India, go to a specific target and start killing people. He was then expected to die. It’s entirely possible that poverty played a role in his recruitment, but it isn’t always that simple.

 

Men are snatched up by these groups, often with messages about the US or India, brainwashed and then dispatched. We know that, from the time he was recruited, he was never left alone.’

 

Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi himself drilled in the final nails of propaganda the night before sending his team by boat from Karachi to Mumbai and what he thought would be their certain deaths. 'Your names will be etched in gold and every Pakistani will praise you,’ he assured them.

 

Kasab had excelled at target shooting and so he along with his partner Abu Ismail, a 25-year-old recruited from Pakistan’s lawless North West Frontier Province, had been selected for the most devastating mission of the attack. The other four teams of two had been briefed to attack the two five-star hotels, the Jewish centre and the backpackers’ bar, killing foreigners and taking hostages in an extended siege. Kasab and Abu Ismail were told 'to unleash hell’ inside the packed Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus (CST).

 

When they arrived at the station, seconds before he opened fire, Kasab was relaxed enough to walk calmly into the busy station lavatory and urinate. The two positioned themselves and nodded to each other, and then the sound of semi-automatic rifles began to resonate through the ticket hall. Many inside the station thought the noise was fireworks set off to celebrate India’s victory over England in a cricket match that evening.

 

Some of the policemen on duty did try to stop Kasab and Abu Ismail, but their wooden-framed, bolt-action rifles jammed and their lathi cane sticks were splintered by the AK-47 bullets. Some just fled. Kasab realised they would not meet any serious opposition inside the station, later recalling with disdain the 'simple weapons’ of the police on duty. The Mumbai police were completely outmanoeuvred and outgunned.

Kasab and Ismail killed 52 people in the station, seriously wounding another 104. An investigation by the FBI after the attack showed that most of the victims were hit in the head and chest – an indication of the terrorists’ high level training and skill as marksmen.

 

Kasab and Ismail then went on to attack a nearby hospital, killing seven. They managed to flee without being apprehended – despite the station and hospital being yards from the Mumbai police headquarters. They then delivered one of the most significant blows of the night by shooting dead three of the Mumbai police’s most senior and respected officers, after hiding in bushes and opening fire on the officers’ vehicle.

 

They were finally stopped three hours after the start of the attack, at a roadblock as they attempted to escape north into the Mumbai suburbs in a hijacked car. Ismail was shot dead at the scene. Kasab was shot (but not fatally) and captured by a police constable.

 

In his first interrogation in hospital, Kasab confidently batted away questions, spinning the police officer half-truths but revealing that they had been sent by Pakistan’s LeT. Despite the gravity of what he had just done Kasab mostly came across as relaxed and composed. In the early hours of the next morning, with the hotels and the Jewish centre still under siege, Rakesh Maria, the head of the state’s anti-terrorism squad, visited him. Kasab was made to sit on the floor, then Maria said, 'There is no point in hiding things. We know how to wrench the truth out of you.’

 

Over the next four hours, Kasab began to give Maria precise details about the attack and his Pakistani handlers, which the police chief was then able to pass on to the army commandos trying to end the ongoing siege. Maria told Kasab that he had already interviewed other members of the team and 'knew everything’ about Kasab’s life and entry into LeT, but wanted to hear it 'from Kasab’s mouth’.

 

 

'I don’t care for your pain. You look in my eyes and tell me how many of you have landed in Mumbai…I don’t like lies, Kasab,’ he said. Eventually Kasab told Maria the names of the nine other terrorists. He spoke about his life in Lahore, how he had left school aged 11 and worked as a labourer. He explained that the various training camps comprised about 25 young men, but, aside from Muzaffar, he was not allowed to socialise with them. 'We were not allowed to know each other,’ he said.

 

Kasab explained to Maria how at his penultimate camp in Kashmir, the recruits were taught how to handle explosives, rocket launchers and mortars. The group was whittled down to 16 young men, but three escaped.

 

'We, the remaining 13, were then sent to a training camp at Muridke. Here we were trained to operate GPS instruments and to navigate boats in the sea. We were conditioned to sail on the high seas for long.’ The final 10 were 'shifted to a LeT safehouse at Azizabad in Karachi in the second week of September. Here we were told to carry out the Mumbai operation.

 

The operation was initially planned for September 27 but then got delayed, the reasons for which I do not know [LeT had found out the Indian authorities were expecting an attack from Pakistan]. Initially we knew each other only by our code names. But soon we told each other our real names, though we were not supposed to. But we bonded well and shared many personal details.’

 

In his instructions for the CST attack, Kasab said that he and Ismail had been instructed to 'kill until the last breath’, to 'keep shooting as long as you could until you die’. Unlike the other four teams, who were instructed to target white Westerners, Kasab and Ismail were told simply to kill anyone in their path.

 

Kasab’s disclosures subsequently helped with the arrest of several other Lashkar operatives, such as David Headley, the American who, in January, was sentenced to serve 35 years’ imprisonment in Chicago.

 

Dr Fair points out that it was incredibly inconvenient for LeT that Kasab was apprehended and then revealed details of the group – which has never claimed responsibility for the attack – and about the attack itself. 'The LeT modus operandi is that you either escape so you can be recycled, or you get killed.

 

You’re certainly not supposed to get caught. Kasab got caught, and he squealed like a pig. He ultimately failed in that sense.’

Maria, who was in charge of operations from the Mumbai police control room on the night of the attacks, was subsequently appointed chief investigator of the 26/11 case.

 

In the six weeks after the attack Maria interviewed Kasab several times. He told me that he was able to 'break’ Kasab using the 'good cop/bad cop’ technique. 'People ask, how could he break down as he is a trained terrorist, but we are trained interrogators,’ he said. 'You have to be a little angry, a little soft with him. Within 24 hours we were able to break him and get the details.’

 

Offering a unique insight into Kasab’s possible motivation, Maria told me that Kasab was 'totally indoctrinated’ – but not by religion. 'He felt what he was doing was right. He felt like he was in a war-like situation and he was a soldier entering another country. He was intelligent. He was unemployed and had no status in his village.

 

These people [LeT handlers] very cleverly exploited the feeling of being an unknown identity to all of a sudden being somebody important. Prior to the training he was being rebuked by his parents for having no job. He was being rebuked by the elders for being unemployed and for being a nobody in the village. His friends and others did not give him any importance. He went for training and he comes back as a LeT man, a jihadi.

 

 Now that earlier image gives way. His parents treat him with respect. There is some sort of sanctity with the social acceptability.’

 

 

 

 

Kasab told Maria that he had met Hafiz Saeed, the head of LeT, at a training camp. 'He said we would die waging jihad, our faces would glow like the moon. Our bodies would emanate scent. And we would go to paradise.’ A month after the attacks,

 

Maria took Kasab to a Mumbai morgue. The nine bodies of his fellow terrorists lay decomposing, covered in flies. The stench was overpowering and Kasab stared at the ground, tears rolling down his face. 'He kept saying that “my handlers always told me that this life is not important, the next life is very important and you will see that when you die for the cause there is a glow on your face and there is scent emanating from your body when you die in the cause of jihad”. The bodies were charred because they had been burnt in the gunfights. There was a stink, so I asked him, “Where is the glow?”

 

'When he saw his compatriots, lying like that, with bullet holes, charred bodies, it came as a shock. I wouldn’t say that he was showing remorse at that point. I think the only sadness was that he finally realised that he was taken for a ride.’

 

Kasab spent the next four years in isolation in a specially made bullet- and bomb-proof cell. One of his jailors has described how, as the nights rolled by, he began sobbing 'like a baby’ and calling out for his mother. His only time out of the cell came during his trial in April 2009, where he mainly sat day after day in silence, sometimes smiling shyly at the female journalists covering the case.

 

He was found guilty of all 86 charges including murder, conspiracy, and waging war against India.

 

Devika Rotawan, who identified Kasab in court, was 11 years old when she went to CST to catch a late train. 'I was going to Pune with my father and brother. Suddenly, armed men opened fire and, as I was trying to escape it, one bullet hit my stomach. I fell unconscious.

Kasab was laughing as he fired aimlessly at us,’ she said. The public prosecutor in the case, Ujjwal Nikam, is clear in his conviction that Kasab was 'pure evil’. 'He was very intelligent, very sharp,’ Nikam explained. 'He was fully knowing of what he’d done. The photograph of him killing people at CST – Kasab was enjoying that, taking pleasure. He was laughing. It is clear that he had no repentance or remorse.’

 

Kasab’s three state-appointed lawyers saw him differently. One of them, Abbas Kazmi, told me that Kasab realised the enormity of what he had done and that 'emotionally, he was like any normal human being’. 'It is far-fetched what has been reported through the prosecution – that this person was crafty and remorseless.

 

If you see a young man aged 20, 21, and the places where they come from, a lot of poverty, no academic background and no one to support them – such people could easily fall prey to brainwashing.’

 

Kasab was sentenced to death in March 2010. When, after a series of appeals, his sentence was upheld for the final time by the supreme court at the end of August last year, Kasab, then 25, reportedly pleaded with another of his lawyers, Raju Rama­chandran, in desperation to 'please help me get out of jail’.

 

But in the days leading up to his hanging, his jailors said that the crying at night stopped and Kasab fell silent and calm.

 

He was asked if he wanted to speak to his family, but replied 'No’ – though he did request that his mother, Noor, be informed of his death. Kasab was hanged at twilight on the morning of November 21 2012 in the grounds of Yerwada prison in the neighbouring city of Pune.

 

Given the codename Operation X, the execution was shrouded in such secrecy that even the prime minister did not know it was happening.

 

 

 

 

Kasab, the killer with the child’s smile who gave terror a face and name, had no last request, but his final words were recorded as: 'Allah ki kasam, dobara aisi galti nahin karunga [I swear by God, I will not commit such a mistake ever again].’ He was buried in the prison grounds. Nobody representing his family or Pakistani authorities was witness or claimed the body.

 

The Kasab family disappeared the week after the attack and have not been seen or heard from since. In Faridkot life continues as normal. On the side of a building on the road out of the village is daubed in large red Urdu lettering, go for jihad!

 

 

Friday, 19 April 2013

Hindus .

Why are we Hindus taking all this lying down. Why is there an IAS
officer as head of very temple. Can they dare go to a Masjid or a
church? Please see the article and decide for yourself.

Foreign writer opens our eyes.

The Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Act of 1951 allows State
Governments and politicians to take over thousands of Hindu Temples
and maintain complete control over them and their properties. It is
claimed that they can sell the temple assets and properties and use
the money in any way they choose.

A charge has been made not by any Temple authority, but by a foreign
writer, Stephen Knapp in a book (Crimes Against India and the Need to
Protect Ancient Vedic Tradition) published in the United States that
makes shocking reading.

Hundreds of temples in centuries past have been built in India by
devout rulers and the donations given to them by devotees have been
used for the benefit of the (other) people. If, presently, money
collected has ever been misused (and that word needs to be defined),
it is for the devotees to protest and not for any government to
interfere. This letter is what has been happening currently under an
intrusive law.

It would seem, for instance, that under a Temple Empowerment Act,
about 43,000 temples in Andhra Pradesh have come under government
control and only 18 per cent of the revenue of these temples have been
returned for temple purposes, the remaining 82 per cent being used for
purposes unstated.

Apparently even the world famous Tirumala Tirupati Temple has not been
spared. According to Knapp, the temple collects over Rs 3,100 crores
every year and the State Government has not denied the charge that as
much as 85 per cent of this is transferred to the State Exchequer,
much of which goes to causes that are not connected with the Hindu
community. Was it for that reason that devotees make their offering to
the temples? Another charge that has been made is that the Andhra
Government has also allowed the demolition of at least ten temples for
the construction of a golf course. Imagine the outcry
writes Knapp, if ten mosques had been demolished.

It would seem that in Karanataka, Rs. 79 crores were collected from
about two lakh temples and from that, temples received Rs seven crores
for their maintenance, Muslim madrassahs and Haj subsidy were given
Rs. 59 crore and churches about Rs 13 crore. Very generous of the
government.


Because of this, Knapp writes, 25 per cent of the two lakh temples or
about 50,000 temples in Karnataka will be closed down for lack of
resources, and he adds: The only way the government can continue to do
this is because people have not stood up enough to stop it.

Knapp then refers to Kerala where, he says, funds from the Guruvayur
Temple are diverted to other government projects denying improvement
to 45 Hindu temples. Land belonging to the Ayyappa Temple, apparently
has been grabbed and Church encroaches are occupying huge areas of
forest land, running into thousands of acres, near Sabarimala.

A charge is made that the Communist state government of Kerala wants
to pass an Ordinance to disband the Travancore & Cochin Autonomous
Devaswom Boards (TCDBs) and take over their limited independent
authority of 1,800 Hindu temples. If what the author says is true,
even the Maharashtra Government wants to take over some 450,000
temples in the state which would supply a huge amount of revenue to
correct the states bankrupt conditions

And to top it all, Knapp says that in Orissa, the state government
intends to sell over 70,000 acres of endowment lands from the
Jagannath Temple, the proceeds of which would solve a huge financial
crunch brought about by its own mismanagement of temple assets.

Says Knapp: Why such occurrences are so often not known is that the
Indian media, especially the English television and press, are often
anti-Hindu in their approach, and thus not inclined to give much
coverage, and certainly no sympathy, for anything that may affect the
Hindu community. Therefore, such government action that play against
the Hindu community go on without much or any attention attracted to them.

Knapp obviously is on record. If the facts produced by him are
incorrect, it is up to the government to say so. It is quite possible
that some individuals might have set up temples to deal with lucrative
earnings. But that, surely, is none of the governments business?
Instead of taking over all earnings, the government surely can appoint
local committees to look into temple affairs so that the amount
discovered is fairly used for the public good?

Says Knapp: Nowhere in the free, democratic world are the religious
institutions managed, maligned and controlled by the government, thus
denying the religious freedom of the people of the country. But it is
happening in India. Government officials have taken control of Hindu
temples because they smell money in them, they recognise the
indifference of Hindus, they are aware of the unlimited patience and
tolerance of Hindus, they also know that it is not in the blood of
Hindus to go to the streets to demonstrate, destroy property,
threaten, loot, harm and kill

Many Hindus are sitting and watching the demise of their culture. They
need to express their views loud and clear Knapp obviously does not
know that should they do so, they would be damned as communalists.
But it is time some one asked the Government to lay down all the facts
on the table so that the public would know what is happening behind
its back. Robbing Peter to pay Paul is not secularism. And temples are
not for looting, under any name. One thought that Mohammad of Ghazni
has long been dead.

HARD REALITIES.........

Hinduism remains the most attacked and under siege of all the major
world religions. This is in spite of the fact that Hinduism is the
most tolerant, pluralistic and synthetic of the world's major
religions.

A country making leass and less sense - Ayaz Amir - Dawn


Ayaz Amir - Islamabad diary

A Country Making less and less Sense
If we had to come to this why did we go through the trouble of Partition? I have wanted to ask this question for years but never could bring up the courage to frame it thus. After all, how can one question the basis of one’s existence?
But as we continue to invent ever more elaborate forms of extremism and violence – killing in the name of our higher faith and exulting no end when the wages of barbarism are impressive – this question returns to haunt me.
I can understand our helplessness, or rather the army’s helplessness, in getting hold of someone like Hakeemullah Mehsud. He is in the mountains where our troops cannot go, perhaps for perfectly valid military reasons. It was not easy for the Americans to fight the Viet Cong and the Taliban plus Al-Qaeda are our Viet Cong.
What a simpleton like me fails to understand, however, is our helplessness in the face of other extremist and sectarian elements holed up not in the mountains but to be found across Pakistan. Lahore, Karachi, other cities – zealots of the faith ready to pick up the rod or the gun at the slightest provocation, you find them everywhere.
Oxford and Cambridge, misguided spirits, may boast of their colleges. Thanks to a history of jihadi warfare, and thanks to other countries, fortresses of piety, meddling in our affairs, we can take pride in the largest collection of religious schools or seminaries anywhere in the world. Can the outstanding scientists produced elsewhere match the stream of outstanding bigots pouring out from our founts of learning?
And state and army are helpless spectators, mounting empty words and firing the most fearful verbal broadsides and going on and on about what they will do, always in the future tense. The title the Mughals gave such intrepid warriors was Sher-e-Qalin, Tigers of the Carpet, their most terrible victories won on reclining cushions. (I am indebted to friend Aakar Patel for this information.)
The Lashkar-e-Jhangvi claims proud responsibility for the Hazara massacres and while in Balochistan this may be a shadowy outfit, although there are enough reasons to think this is not the case, aren’t we aware that elements connected to this outfit, or mutations from it, are to be found across the four corners of the holy province of Punjab? Will anyone do anything about them? We’ll look and sound tough, count on this, but perish the thought of anyone actually doing something.
So I will frame the question again: will some astrologers kindly shed some light on the meaning of our destiny? What are we about? Where are we headed? What are we doing to ourselves? The purpose of any society is to give a better deal to its people, a semblance of justice and prosperity, and some hope for the future that those who come after us will have something to hold on to. But if after 65 years of independent existence the mess that we have created is the best that we can do, any fool will be tempted to ask whether we have proven ourselves fit for nationhood.
We sit across a great piece of geography. But this strategic location, if it is strategic – and I am aware that in the hands of no Clausewitzian scholars has the word strategy been put to more absurd uses – what have we done with it except get into needless adventures and become the bag-carriers of outside powers, on wages that any self-respecting coolie, put to such hard usage, would think twice before accepting.
Let’s stop worrying about India. In its wildest dreams India could not do to us what we have managed to inflict on ourselves. RAW, with input from the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, could have tried for a hundred years and not been able to invent the lashkars and jaishes and tehriks that we have produced in such abundance. What’s more, to scare no one so much as ourselves. Our jihadis used to dream of planting the green flag on the Delhi Red Fort or creating fanciful emirates in Central Asia. Those proving arduous undertakings, they have embarked upon a new jihad – conquering Pakistan from within.
Sinners of my age are in a strange kind of bind. We remember Pakistan as it used to be, no ideal kingdom to be sure but for all its faults a good place to be in. And now this onslaught of ignorance and illiteracy, the population breeding as if the end of the world is at hand and a laughable class of people claiming the mantle of national leadership, each luminary of this class a bigger hypocrite than the fellow standing next to him.
Look at the next joke: the Election Commission wants to clean the national stables. Does my friend Fakhruddin Ebrahim think he is Hercules that he will go about this labour? He can be Hercules and blessed by the gods into the bargain and yet not come close to touching these sacred stables. If the loan write-off or default clause alone was implemented, more than half the so-called national leadership would be out of the ring. That is why it is not going to happen. So let all doubters be reassured that the only thing to fear is the Election Commission’s bark, not its bite.
Since when were we so lucky that at the stroke of a pen we would be rid of half the incompetents and humbugs vowing to bring about a revolution in these hallowed spaces? The meek shall inherit the earth but, alas, not so soon.
We recently worked ourselves into a passion on the subject of dual nationals, and rightly so. But why didn’t we stop to think a bit about those politicians aspiring to high office, or already in high office, with huge bank accounts abroad, and not just the odd flat or corner shop in London and New York but immense properties at their command? Indeed, some of our leading worthies now have most of their income parked in other countries. Dual nationals and dual capitalists: whose allegiance is the more divided?
Trust my friend Malik Riaz to take the vulgarity stakes to greater heights when he gifts a behemoth of a palace amidst a 25-acre spread in Lahore to the sitting president of the republic. In any other place this would have provoked a storm of outrage. Not in Lahore where this elegant move is greeted with a deafening silence...perhaps because, Allah be praised, many of the potential stone-throwers themselves reside in glass palaces. And from such ping-pong players the more innocent amongst us expect the miracle of change and, you’ve guessed it, revolution.
This is a tale of two countries, both named Pakistan. The Pakistan created in 1947 collapsed amidst the tumult of the 1971 war, the two-nation theory plunging into the waters of the Bay of Bengal. In the aftermath of that self-propelled disaster Zulfikar Ali Bhutto proclaimed the birth of a new Pakistan. But learning nothing from history we have allowed that thing of fantasy to come to its present pass, a cockpit of some of the most confused ideologies to be found anywhere on the planet.
With our national energies thus crippled how on earth do we get our priorities right? How on earth do we fix our economy and break our begging bowl, and bring out the potentiality of a people still able to achieve so much if only there was someone to light their path and show them the way?

Tuesday, 16 April 2013

Village in India plants 111 trees every time a girl is born

A heart warming tale.

Village in India plants 111 trees every time a girl is born


© Landesa
All too often, it seems that an increase in human population must come at a cost to the environment, like in straining resources and encroachment on once wild habitats. But one quaint village in India has adopted a wonderfully eco-conscious tradition that is actually helping to ensure a greener future with each new generation.
While in some parts of India, many expectant parents still say they'd prefer bearing sons, members of the Piplantri village, in the western state of Rajasthan, are breaking this trend by celebrating the birth of each baby girl in way that benefits everyone. For every female child that's born, the community gathers to plant 111 fruit trees in her honor in the village common.
This unique tradition was first suggested by the village's former leader, Shyam Sundar Paliwal, in honor of his daughter who had passed away at a young age.
But planting trees is only one way that the community is ensuring a brighter future for their daughters. According to a report in The Hindu, villagers also pool together around $380 dollars for every new baby girl and deposited in an account for her. The girl's parents are required to contribute $180, and to make a pledge to be considerate guardians.
“We make these parents sign an affidavit promising that they would not marry her off before the legal age, send her to school regularly and take care of the trees planted in her name,” says Paliwal.
Over the last six years alone, as population there has increased, villagers in Piplantri have planted nearly a quarter million trees -- a welcoming forest for the community's youngest members, offering a bit of shade for their brighter future.
Via The Hindu
See also: India Wants to Double Solar Capacity with 1GW Auction, Aims for 20GW by 2022

Article on Swami Vivekananda


December 4, 2012

Do All Religions Teach the Same Truth?

By Richard Schiffman

He cut an exotic figure, the turbaned swami with the princely bearing. "Sister's and brothers of America!" the orange-clad monk began his address to the Parliament of World Religions in Chicago in 1893. Instantly the crowd of over seven thousand people jumped to their feet for a two minute standing ovation.
The swami went on to speak about his favorite theme, the unity of world religions. "As the different streams all mingle their water in the sea, so, O Lord," he quoted from Hindu scriptures, "the different paths which men take ... crooked or straight, all lead to Thee!"
"After hearing him," a reporter for the New York Herald wrote, "we feel how foolish it is to send missionaries to this learned nation."
Over the next few days, The World Congress of Religions will bring spiritual leaders and academics from around the globe to Washington, D.C. to commemorate the 150th birth anniversary of Swami Vivekananda. It will be a chance to reassess the influence of one of the seminal figures of modern India.
That influence is both greater than anyone could have anticipated back at the end of the 19th century, and also less than the swami might have hoped for. Less than he would have hoped, because more than 100 years after Vivekananda proclaimed the oneness of the world's great faiths, religious discord is on the rise in the Middle East and elsewhere around the globe.
Vivekananda would have been saddened, but not surprised. "No other human motive had deluged the world with blood so much as religion," he ruefully observed, then added, "at the same time, nothing has brought into existence so many hospitals and asylums for the poor. ... Nothing makes us so cruel as religion, and nothing makes us so tender as religion."
A paradox that Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris and the other new atheists seem to have missed!
I was introduced to Swami Vivekananda during a five year stay in India in the 1970s and '80s. The Swami's picture was everywhere -- on postage stamps and on calendar images hung in chai shops side by side with Hindu deities and Bollywood stars. Vivekananda is beloved in India not just for his spiritual teaching, but for being a patron saint of India's independence movement, which would flare up less than two decades after his untimely death at the age of 40. No less a luminary than Mahatma Gandhi credited the charismatic swami with inspiring his life's work. In a nation emasculated by over two centuries of British colonial rule, Swami Vivekananda taught Indians to have pride in their ancient traditions, and faith in what he foresaw as their bright future.
With India's economy now booming, this prophecy is rapidly coming true. But Vivekananda had an even more exalted notion of his country's role than becoming a global economic superpower. He was convinced that India was destined to be the guru to the world.
"Spirituality must conquer the West," he declared. And he called Hinduism "the mother of all religions," not because he believed that its doctrine alone is right, but on the contrary, because it makes no such exclusive claims. "India alone was to be, of all lands, the land of toleration," Vivekananda remarked. "We accept all religions as true."
An astonishing claim given the profusion of dogmas, rites and practices of the world's faiths. But underneath these surface differences, Swami Vivekananda saw the universal impulse to commune with the Most High. All religions conceive a Divine Creative Principle at the root of things, although they call it by different names he said. They unanimously testify that one can commune with this Divinity through prayer and meditation. And the broad ethical principles to love and to forgive, to be generous and kind are also shared by all faiths.
So given their common impulse, similar methods and shared aims, why do religions clash? Vivekananda answered that they clash because they have lost sight of their own deeper purpose -- which is returning us to ourselves. For Swami Vivekananda religion was less about worshipping a God "out there" than recovering a sense of our own innate divinity, which Christian's call "the Christ within."
"Never forget the glory of human nature. We are the greatest God that ever was or will be. Christ and Buddhas are but waves on the boundless ocean which I am. Bow down to nothing but your own higher Self."
These words may sound outrageous to many orthodox believers, even today when these sentiments have been echoed by thinkers like Joseph Campbell, Huston Smith, Eckhart Tolle and other popularizers of Eastern thought. But Swami Vivekananda was not a budding new ager. His teachings were based on the ancient Hindu philosophical doctrine called Vedanta, which holds that there is a spark within all beings of the creative power which forged the universe. Religions, in the Vedantic understanding, are so many different languages for awakening us to the intuition of this Core Self.
Granted, the idea that religions are parallel paths toward the same goal seems to fly in the face of what we see around us: a world of warring creeds, each one proclaiming that its way alone is true. I recently came across an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal by Boston University religion scholar Stephen Prothero. Prothero argues that those who preach the oneness of religion are being disrespectful of the profound, and in his view irreconcilable, differences between religious traditions. He says that we are better served if we understand how these differences have led to conflict, rather than paper them over with a naive notion about the unity of the world's great faiths. I used to get the same arguments from my comparative religion professor, Conrad Hyers at Beloit College, who would joke that, if it were true that all religions were teaching the same thing, he would be out of a job.
These professors are right of course: religions differ. And it certainly is a fact that these doctrinal differences have been a bone of often violent contention throughout human history. But they miss Vivekananda's deeper point that dwelling on the differences rather than on the far more essential common ground between creeds is a prescription for perpetuating these age old conflicts rather than resolving them.
Mystics have always observed that the intellect sees divisions whereas the soul perceives the underlying unity of existence. Religion, for mystics like Swami Vivekananda, is the art of returning human consciousness from fragmentation to unity. He would have disagreed with scholars like Prothero who put their emphasis on the differences between faiths. Vivekananda believed that we do religion a service rather than an offense when we remind it of its mission to heal the divisions between us and within us.
Many of course need no reminding. While many have used their religion as a pretext for acts of hatred and intolerance, this distortion of the religious spirit should not blind us to the untold millions who serve in soup kitchens in the basements of churches, synagogue and mosques, who are motivated by their religious commitment to stand for social justice and to reach out to neighbors who are in trouble.
The wrong kind of religion convinces its followers that they alone possess the key to Truth. The right kind, according to Vivekananda, helps to make one more compassionate, humbler in the face of the Great Mystery, and tolerant of inevitable human differences. The fact that so many believers (and nonbelievers alike) fail to live up to these exalted ideals should not be allowed to overshadow the liberating message of Oneness which is at the heart of faith.
"Truth is one, the wise call it by many names," Swami Vivekananda proclaimed in Chicago. More than 100 years later, this is a lesson that we still need to learn.